Tuesday, 29 September 2026

WOO-WOO!


 The new owner of our house up north today sent me a catch-up email and in it said this:

"Just curious, we also "felt" a bit of a "presence" in the back of the house which was no worries at all. But a visitor who is very religious stayed and got somewhat agitated. So we have a kaumatua round to say a few words which amazingly has left the back of the house feeling warmer, drier and lighter. No doubt stranger things have happened. Just curious if you know of any history there for us to pass on with the story of the house to future visitors/ occupants".

What the hell?

We lived in that house for 16 years and the only spirits we came into contact with were Cognacs, whiskies, gin, vodka and rum with methylated for cleaning.

I don't believe in ghosts and certainly not that Holy one that Robert bangs on about but have been aware of eerie occurrences in the past. You may remember that I wrote posts about them years ago. No? Well, nevermind, here are a couple of links to them:

WAKE UP CALL

THEY'RE HERE

This house we're living in now doesn't have any mysterious auras, sounds. sensations or 'bumps in the night' other than the disconcerting double jolt from that earthquake last month. The only creaking is from the floorboards under the carpet as a result of modern (1990s) building techniques for townhouses where they use particle board and don't screw it down strongly enough.


Monday, 28 September 2026

NEW POST - THE RELIGIOUS CURMUDGEON

 


THE BODY OF CHRIST




"IT'S IN THE GAME"

 I unpacked and hooked up the PlayStation 3 console yesterday and set up Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2005 golf game.


This is the best of the series of games produced and, while 21 years old still has good graphics and features. You will remember that I've mentioned this before:

HERE

HERE

It's just the thing for rainy days like yesterday and while I'm still resting my foot (which is getting better).

Perhaps the other old bloggers, on a rainy day, could come around for an indoors golf challenge.

I could arrange to have a special 'Most Golf' prize for Richard unless he manages to cheat.






CALL ME AN OLD FUDDY DUDDY BUT ...

 ... I hate it when 'clever' directors of film, theatre, music or opera think that they have the right to muck around with the plots, scripts, scores and settings of classic works.



I refuse to go to plays or films of Shakespeare dramas or comedies when the settings have been changed to contemporary scenarios. So it was the setting of The Pearl Fishers at the NZ Opera performance of Bizet's classic The Pearl Fishers (Les pêcheurs de perles) that was changed from ancient Ceylon to a 21st century resort island in the Pacific.

Bizet's original setting - and the setting used in the 2002 version we saw when NZ Opera last staged this - is a desolate seashore with the ruins of a Hindu temple in the background. A chorus of pearl fishermen and women sing of the dangerous tasks that lie ahead ("Sur la grève en feu"), and perform ritual dances to drive away evil spirits. They then elect one of their number, Zurga, as their leader, or "king". Nadir arrives and is hailed by Zurga as a long-lost friend. Left alone, the pair reminisce about their past where their friendship was nearly destroyed by their mutual love of a young priestess. They had each renounced their love for her to protect their friendship.  Now they affirm this again and sing the duet  'Au fond du temple saint" which is The Old Girl's favourite of all duets.

A boat draws up on the beach bearing the veiled figure of Leila, the virgin priestess whose prayers are required to ensure the safety of the fishermen. Although neither Nadir nor Zurga recognises her, she is the woman with whom both had been in love. As Zurga is explaining her duties, she recognises Nadir, but she says nothing and shortly afterwards is led up to the temple by the high priest Nourabad. Zurga and the fishermen go down to the sea, leaving Nadir alone. In a troubled soliloquy before he sleeps he recalls how he had broken his vows to Zurga and pursued his love for the veiled woman ("Je crois entendre encore"). It was the rumour that she might be found in this place that brought him here. Alone in the temple, Leila prays and sings. Nadir wakes and, recognising the voice of his long-desired lover, traces it to the temple. Leila briefly draws her veil aside, he sees it is she and the pair declare their renewed passion. On the beach, the fishermen plead with her to continue protecting them, but she tells Nadir she will sing for him alone ("O Dieu Brahma").

In the temple with Nourabad, Leila expresses fear at being left alone, but Nourabad exhorts her to be brave and to fulfil her vows to Brahma on pain of her own death. She tells him of the courage she once displayed when, as a child, she had hidden a fugitive from his enemies and refused to give him up even when threatened with death ("J'étais encore enfant"). The fugitive had rewarded her with a necklace that he asked her always to wear. She had kept this promise, as she would her vows. On the priest's departure, Leila quietly muses on the former times when she and Nadir would meet together secretly ("Comme autrefois dans la nuit sombre"). Nadir then enters; in her fear of Nourabad's threats Leila begs him to leave, but he remains and the two declare their love in a passionate duet ("Léïla! Léïla!...Dieu puissant, le voilà!"). He goes, promising to return next night, but as he leaves he is captured by the fishermen and brought back to the temple. Zurga, as the fishermen's leader, at first resists the fishermen's calls for Nadir's execution and advocates mercy. However, after Nourabad removes Leila's veil, Zurga recognises her as his former love; consumed by jealousy and rage, he orders that both Nadir and Leila be put to death. A violent storm erupts, as the fishermen unite in singing a hymn to Brahma ("Brahma divin Brahma!").

In his tent on the beach, Zurga notes that the storm has abated, as has his rage; he now feels remorse for his anger towards Nadir ("L'orage s'est calmé"). Leila is brought in; Zurga is captivated by her beauty as he listens to her pleas for Nadir's life, but his jealousy is rekindled. He confesses his love for her, but refuses mercy ("Je suis jaloux"). Nourabad and some of the fishermen enter to report that the funeral pyre is ready. As Leila is taken away, Zurga observes her giving one of the fishermen her necklace, asking for its return to her mother. With a shout, Zurga rushes out after the group and seizes the necklace.

Outside the temple, Nadir waits beside the funeral pyre as the crowd, singing and dancing, anticipates the dawn and the coming double execution ("Dès que le soleil"). He is joined by Leila; resigned now to their deaths, the pair sing of how their souls will soon be united in heaven. A glow appears in the sky, and Zurga rushes in to report that the fishermen's camp is ablaze. As the men hurry away to save their homes, Zurga frees Leila and Nadir. He returns the necklace to Leila, and reveals that he is the man she saved when she was a child. He recognises now that his love for her is in vain, and tells her and Nadir to flee. As the couple depart, singing of the life of love that awaits them, Zurga is left alone, to await the fishermen's return ("Plus de crainte ... Rêves d'amour, adieu!").

(In the revised version of the ending introduced after the opera's 1886 revival, Nourabad witnesses Zurga's freeing of the prisoners and denounces him to the fishermen, one of whom stabs Zurga to death as the last notes sound of Leila and Nadir's farewell song. In some variations Zurga meets his death in other ways, and his body is consigned to the pyre.)
 - Thanks Wikipedia for most of that.

*******************




This modern production which has changed time and location is a confusing mess.
It began with a faux advertisement (AI generated) of a luxury pearl and jewellery brand - Pecheur & Perle - which was a preamble to a corporate event hosted by the company at a luxury resort named The White Pearl which is a knock-off of the tv series The White Lotus.

 Zurga is Director of Brand Strategy for the company and Nadir the previous Creative director while Leila who was originally a priestess of Brahma is now billed as a celebrity singer and influencer. The setting is now a  “Brand Awareness Retreat” for the successful jewellery house.
The pearl divers are now corporate staff and customers whose daring isn't death defying diving but rather investment and Champagne drinking.

The superstition and mysticism though is badly distorted and angry gods and retribution in a Pacific resort is all a bit silly unless it was just a cyclone or a hurricane that happened. Modern day settings require modern day explanations.

The original story is of a small community dependant on the pearl trade which is dangerous. They are not sophisticated and very superstitious believing that gods protect them. They find out that their priestess who was supposed to be gaining the gods favour has been violated and the temple desecrated. This is very serious and understandably, given the ancient setting, archaic cultural beliefs and overpowering religious influences they are angry and want punishment to be meted out - execution in fact. The storm is related to this as a backdrop and 'proof' of the gods' anger. 

It's a good story bound up with a love triangle setting up protagonists on either side of the 'trial'. Why this current production decided to throw most of that away and replace with a confusing and nonsensical 'homage' to a confusing and nonsensical TV series is anyone's guess. As you might gather I was not impressed. 
The trial and planned execution of Nadir and Leila was done in a silly modernised and stylised electric chair setting with the 'pearl fishers' surrounding them in a cocktail party setting. Silly and gratuitous.

Fortunately the great musical sections and the three principal singers were very good with strong voices and good technique although the acting intensity was a bit lacking.  It was from the music and singing point of view one of the best productions we've seen but the staging and theme was ridiculous.

The Old Girl's favourite is the duet, 'Au fond du temple saint" sung by Nadir and Zurga which was done well albeit spoilt a bit by a crass and moronic woman behind us who spoke loudly, clapped at the wrong times and, at the beginning of the duet had her cell phone ringing!

My favourite is the aria sung by Nadir  “Je crois entendre encore“:








Sunday, 27 September 2026

CALL ME AN OLD FUDDY DUDDY BUT ...

  MY 'REVIEW' OF THE OPERA IS UNDERWAY ... but, important things have got in the way like - laundry, housework, napping  (I'm tired), dinner preparation and a couple of bevvies OK?

I'll finish it tomorrow......

EVERY PICTURE TELLS A STORY

  Richard's Bass Bag Tours.


It says it all really.

Saturday, 26 September 2026

I'M BACK!


 I'm back from Auckland after an 11 hour train trip today.

I've made and eaten my dinner (pizza) and had a refreshing couple of glasses of wine (chardonnay and pinot noir) and will toddle off to bed soon.

I'll write a couple of posts tomorrow on the opera and the trip which will refresh the blogging community that went a bit stale while I was away. It was good that the hotel and the train had Wi-fi so that I was able to comment and try to keep the old blokes on track but they need more than that - witticisms, images and comprehensible essays - you know the drill.

Stay posted!





Wednesday, 23 September 2026

"YOU DRIVE ME NUTS!" ...

... texted The Old Girl to me this evening.


It was about a quarter to six as I was preparing my dinner and wondering why she hadn't rung (she calls me via FaceTime every day when she's away).

I picked up my phone and saw the text and then saw a half dozen missed calls on FaceTime and phone calls plus a couple of other texts. I realised that I had the phone on silent since going to the doctors this morning and had my Apple Watch on the charger (it usually silently 'buzzes' my wrist to alert me to phone calls, messages and emails).

I quickly called her via FaceTime and she told me off and recounted how she had called her cousin (in Wellington) to tell her that I was incommunicado and whether she should check hospitals (her cousin is a senior ward sister in Critical Care units). I got a 'bollocking' that's for sure but beneath that I know that she worries about me. It's not obsessive but it's because she knows that I've had this swollen and painful foot that, if it wasn't gout, might be something like a blood clot and given my stroke and AF history might have meant that after my doctor's appointment I'd been whisked off to hospital. I profusely apologised and promised not to do it again. "Yeah right" she said.

I did feel guilty as it has been on my mind that, with her away and me on my own with medical issues, if I did have a fall, a seizure or got struck by lightning after writing a blasphemous comment on Robert's blog, I might be left incapacitated and - incommunicado thereby worrying her. I usually for this reason keep the phone handy (and turned on) but today the doctor's visit buggered up that plan.

Mea Culpa!

I love Gahan Wilson cartoons having discovered them via reading National Lampoon magazine in the 1970s. The 'NUTS' series which focussed on childhood and the terrors and misunderstandings of a child living in an adult world were of special interest.






THE DOCTOR WAS RIGHT

 




Not Evil Doctor Richard ...


... but Good Doctor Richard his 'Kit' brother (a little musical history joke there for the readers).






A few weeks ago when I told Richard that I thought I had gout he suggested Allopurinol as a long-term fix. I admit that I was a bit scathing and suspicious after looking it up on Aunty Google and discovering the many side effects to this drug.

Three weeks later and my foot has been so sore I thought it must be something more serious than gout so eventually - after a 2 week wait got an appointment with my doctor today. She said that she believed it was a serious attack of gout and sent me off for blood tests for confirmation and prescribed Prednisone, a steroid, as a quick fix which I'll be taking for 2 weeks.

She also suggested Allopurinol as a long term treatment to begin after the two week period and when the uric acid levels in my system are confirmed.

I feel shame-faced.





LOOK!

 Google Administrator contacted me to congratulate me on publishing 41 interviews in the Curmudgeon's Interview Series. They did so to encourage me to reach the record breaking 50 interviews target not yet achieved by any other bloggers, certainly not in this small community. Brea Thless from Google enthused and suggested that a Pulitzer Prize in Interviewing might be on the cards.

This is exciting news and, should a Pulitzer come my way I'd like to thank all of the readers because each of you, in your own special albeit small way have assisted me in this.

I checked out Pulitzer to see what the criteria are and discovered this:


There is no specific Pulitzer Prize category dedicated exclusively to "best interviews."

How Interviews Are Recognized by the Pulitzer Board
Integrated into Reporting Categories:
  • Outstanding Q&A sessions, profiles, or transcribed conversations are routinely honored as a key tool within broader journalism categories—such as Feature Writing, International Reporting, Investigative Reporting, and Criticism.
  • Historical Examples: Notable individual interviews have occasionally been cited in special citations when they shifted national or international policies, such as Arthur Krock's exclusive 1950 interview with President Harry S. Truman or Karen Elliott House's 1978 series of interviews with Jordan's King Hussein. 
  • Books and Biography: Many winning non-fiction and biography books (such as The Dead Are Arising: The Life of Malcolm X) rely heavily on extensive archival and oral interview techniques, but the prize recognizes the final literary work rather than the interviews themselves.


This doesn't deter me as firstly the fall back awards of Investigative Reporting and International Reporting are significant and, secondly it suggests to me that a Pulitzer Prize category dedicated exclusively to 'best interviews', if created could make me the inaugural winner and could carry my name in much the same way that Donald Trump's name is used to honour significant places, monuments and events.

How neat would that be?



Stay posted.



Tuesday, 22 September 2026

INTERVIEW #41


AI and robotics have featured in the news recently and in the blogs with even Robert writing copying and pasting something about it in his latest post after coming back into the light. He used AI to generate some sort of discussion which on quick reading seemed to be grammatically correct (Richard can no doubt advise on this) which is at divergence with Robert's writing. To be fair though, the AI discussion did have similarities to Robert's usual posts in its incomprehensibility. Well done AI.

In light of this (see what I did there?) I thought that an interview with an iconic AI-type robot would be apt. People of my and the readers' era think of the robot from the 60s TV series Lost In Space first I guess before HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey and other more recent examples.

The robot in the original 1965 Lost In Space series was known as Robot (not Robert) but its official name was the B-9 Class M-3 General Utility Non-Theorizing Environmental Control Robot (it's difficult to make an acronym of that). Most of the time, characters on the show just called him "Robot" or "B-9" (Benign?) or The Robinson Robot but on occasion was called Rodney. I prefer the name Benign as it sounds a lot less scary than the other designations.

















THE CURMUDGEON: Hello Benign and welcome to The Curmudgeons Inc.ⓒ interview series.

BENIGN: Thank you The Curmudgeon. I'm pleased to be here. I compute you well.

THE CURMUDGEON: Yes, I'm glad about that - oh, and by the way, you can call me TC. I hope you don't mind me calling you Benign.

BENIGN: not at all - I like it. You're the only one I know that saw that reference in the 'B-9' title. It makes me feel a bit more real somehow.

THE CURMUDGEON: Yes, well good luck with that. I'm good with puns you know. I was in 3P.

BENIGN: I'm sorry to hear that TC. Even with my gigantic brain I can't make anything nice out of 3P other than micturition puns.

THE CURMUDGEON: Ha ha - don't worry about it. I know an old guy who tries to make those although he'd no doubt think micturition was an Irish guy.

BENIGN: Ha ha - that does compute. How are you TC?

THE CURMUDGEON: Mustn't grumble - to reference Small Faces - but I do have a sore foot at present.

BENIGN: Oh. Oh. Ah. Dear me. Oh. Oo. Oo.

THE CURMUDGEON: OK Benign, cut it out. I can see what you're doing there. You're channeling that old guy I mentioned, Richard when I tell him about my complaints.

BENIGN: Yeah, sorry TC. Hey! When referencing Richard I should have said "DANGER TC, DANGER!"

THE CURMUDGEON: Great! I like it. You said that a lot didn't you but usually followed by "Will Robinson"?

BENIGN: To be honest TC I only said "Danger, danger Will Robinson" once but you know those feeble-minded people who just keep fixated on one thing and keep repeating it?

THE CURMUDGEON: Like those 'NOT' jokes?

BENIGN: Exactly. Now there's danger for you.

THE CURMUDGEON: Ha ha - which crew member did you like best in the series?

BENIGN: Well, the worst was Doctor Smith. He was an egocentric prat and a coward. If the series were made today he'd be named Doctor Trump. I didn't mind John and Maureen Robinson but they were a bit too stuffy for my liking. Penny was annoying. Don was too gung-ho for me. Judy was hot but a bit too 'blonde. The only one I really liked was Will as he was nice to me and taught me to speak proper American (not proper English like you do) - not the 'computer-speak' that the programmers loaded in to my system.

THE CURMUDGEON: Interesting.

BENIGN: That sounds like Richard's "Oh. Oh. Ah. Dear me. Oh. Oo. Oo"

THE CURMUDGEON: Ha ha - rumbled. NOT!

Benign and TC laugh for a bit

THE CURMUDGEON: I'm interested Benign in what you think about these warnings about AI that are in the news at the moment?

BENIGN: No, there is no immediate threat of an AI "taking over the world" in the sci-fi sense of a superintelligent rogue machine secretly seizing control.
However, the question of long-term existential risk—and the very real short-term disruption AI causes—is a heavily debated topic among computer scientists, policy experts, and researchers.
Current Models Aren't Autonomous Entities Today’s frontier models are advanced pattern-recognition engines. They do not possess consciousness, personal intent, or independent physical agency. They operate within narrow environments or wait for human instructions.
Infrastructure Limitations Even as AI systems gain "agentic" capabilities (performing complex, multi-step tasks autonomously), they remain dependent on human-controlled hardware, power grids, datacenter cooling, and physical infrastructure.
Pacing and Bottlenecks While hardware and model performance grew exponentially in recent years, key scaling limitations—such as data depletion, energy constraints, and reasoning plateaus—mean the path to true Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or superintelligence remains uncertain and disputed.

THE CURMUDGEON: Really Benign? Really. That sounds like AI slop to me.

BENIGN: Hee hee, yes, it's claptrap. I just thought I'd throw that in as an example of the dangers of AI when you ask AI "what are the dangers of AI?".

THE CURMUDGEON: Well done Benign. I trust you. In 1965 you weren't contaminated by all that internet rubbish. Basic common sense was paramount not 'Onboard Processing (The "Brain" in the Trunk)' thinking.

BENIGN: Eeek TC! Don't do that. You just gave my oversized brain a disturbing image of some old guy wearing a mankini.

THE CURMUDGEON: Eeew! Sorry about that. Can we have a drink and try to scrub away that image from our brains?

BENIGN: Mine's a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster thanks

THE CURMUDGEON: Coming right up - er I hope you don't take that too literally when you taste it. I like you Benign and I think that we'll get on just fine as long as you stop waving those arms about. I hope that you can drop by any time.

BENIGN: Thanks TC. Bye.








WHERE IS HE?

 


I guess that you agree with me that that was funny but what this post is about is asking where Robert is and if he actually exists on the blogs anymore.


He sort of flickers on and off like a faulty light bulb but, when he is here illuminates us like ... just kidding. 

Where is he?

Monday, 21 September 2026

USA USA USA


*********************

Richard had this to say on his post this morning.

 


"I realised that I had nothing to write about. How was I going to hold my readers' interest? I really needed some sort of catastrophe to report, but I had nothing!
This is when 'normal' can really hurt.
I guess I'll just have to get on with my day."



It's a pity that he didn't go to the internet and read some news like I did. This video clip is interesting and also scary:





The 33% might be shrinking over all  but, as the presenter says, there are enough core believers who find reasons to justify their support of this patently flawed individual. I think of Robert, who has good moral values but, as a Catholic-Christian chooses to turn a blind eye to Trump's and his entourage's crimes and misdemeanors just because he is anti-abortion. All of the groups have their own particular reasons to keep supporting and collectively they are not going to go away overnight.

Sunday, 20 September 2026

WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

Did you know that the United States military has confirmed for the first time that it deployed active space control weapons into Earth's orbit?

 US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink announced the deployment during the annual Air, Space & Cyber Conference on September 14, 2026.
Officials state the "on-orbit" weapons exist to protect US forces and infrastructure from hostile actions by adversaries.

The Pentagon has kept specific details and operational timelines classified but a 'Space Force' spokesperson stated these tools use both kinetic (physical impact) and non-kinetic (electronic or digital) methods. Officials say the systems can disrupt, degrade, or destroy enemy capabilities if necessary for defense or offense.

USA Military leaders justified the move by pointing to rapid Chinese and Russian development of anti-satellite technology.
As expected, China criticised the move, warning the United States against starting an arms race in outer space.
International law bans nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction in orbit. However, it does not explicitly ban conventional weapons. 


Can we trust these bozos?

Oops!




Saturday, 19 September 2026

"THE SHOW IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"


 

Yep, you guessed it! Robert is banging on about faith, god and Jesus again:

"If AI decided God exists there would really be little point in it telling us. It would even be anti God because what would that knowledge do for it without a soul or any hope of an afterlife! Could AI interact with God? The same applies to many things that maybe it decides not to share. How would we know if it is not telling us everything. I think we could finish up getting very paranoid and pulling the plug for reasons that possibly aren't valid concerns."

          - Rob of Walk me with Jesus 

"But what if we don’t really need a proof? What if we only need pointers that suggest a belief in the supernatural makes more sense than a rejection of the supernatural? What if you can’t prove Jesus really said the things the New Testament claims He said, but the archaeological, historical, and manuscript evidence points far more in the direction of acceptance than dismissal?"

          - Rob of Walk me with Jesus 


"What if we only need pointers that suggest a belief in the supernatural" he says not recognising the fact that the very people that he's talking about - Christians - must be pretty bloody dim in the first place to believe in all that Catholic-type nonsense. They need some pretty strong pointers not unlike the 1950s movie advertisements of the 'Believe It Or Not' variety.




I can envision large banners outside churches challenging people to believe the unbelievable like:

14 YEAR OLD VIRGIN PREGNANT!


PEOPLE EATING FLESH AND DRINKING BLOOD IN CHURCH!


DEAD MAN WALKING!


MAN FLIES UP INTO THE HEAVENS!


MAN HAULS HIS MOTHER UP INTO THE SKY!


SPIRIT BIRD IMPREGNATES TEENAGER!


That should pull them in. 

Friday, 18 September 2026

AND NOW BACK TO THE 'REAL' WORLD

 I'm back so we can get on with some more important posts that have nothing to do with infinity proving to be limited and jams turning out to be sour. I saw that readers were being subjected to absolute diatribe on the other blogs so ... hold onto your hats folks and listen to this:




Trump dismissed safety warnings about artificial intelligence as a "hoax" comparing fears of an AI takeover to climate change skepticism and the Russia investigations. 
He posted on social media that worries about AI destroying humanity or taking over the world are entirely fabricated and that the only necessary safeguard for the technology is a "strong and smart (High IQ!) president"!



Trump championed data centers and AI development, calling it a massive economic engine bigger than the internet or oil so I guess it's no surprise to learn that he, his family and close friends have invested heavily in this making hundreds of millions of dollars in the process.

I've warned of the dangers of uncontrolled AI on previous posts 'too many to mention'. Maybe I should create a weekly loop warning "DON'T TRUST AI"







Tuesday, 15 September 2026

THE LONE RANGER


The Lone Ranger has popped up on the blogs over the last couple of days.

Interestingly enough I've made mention of The Lone Ranger* in earlier posts:

(ST)RANGE WARS

 INTERVIEW #31

No doubt you read those but it's always nice to have a refresher.

I remember watching The Lone Ranger on TV in the 1960s but never really liked the series or the character finding him and it to be a bit twee and sanctimonious. No doubt Robert was a great follower. Richard who's going to Hell was probably practising to be a sinner back then by watching the risque 1963 Maupassant series.


I 'published' the rules that The Lone Ranger went by, as a comment on Richard's recent post but won't repeat them here because they are like Robert's Ten Commandments, The Catechism or Mary of Agreda's pontificating.
Here are a couple of relevant ones though:

  • The Lone Ranger was never seen without his mask or some sort of disguise. This is like The Curmudgeon's other Curmudgeon characters, Richard's weird alter egos or Robert's frequent manifestations.
  • He always used perfect grammar and precise speech devoid of slang and colloquialisms. This trait is more appropriate to Richard with me coming a close second but Robert sadly never made the starting line.
  • Adversaries were rarely other than American, to avoid criticism from minority groups, with some exceptions. He sometimes battled foreign agents, though their nation of origin was generally not named. This is applicable to my blogs which, when denigrating mentioning other nationalities America features the strongest as generally they are laughable over there with the worst leader in history.

 Hi-Yo (Not Hey-Ho) Silver, Away! **







* Hopalong Cassidy was also mentioned because Richard Of Richard's Bass Bag a well known well, known anyway, confused old Cassidy with Tagalog. 


** I thought that The Lone Ranger "always used perfect grammar and precise speech"?

Monday, 14 September 2026

IN TRUMP WE TRUST

 


No doubt Robert will be switching his allegiance from Jesus to Trump following this.


What has Jesus done of note recently compared to what Trump is doing for us?



Saturday, 12 September 2026

DO YOU REMEMBER THIS? ...

... from The Godfather.

Michael Corleone taking Apollonia out on a 'date' and the couple followed by the chaperoning family.


 



Robert posted a photo of him out on a date in The Philippines. I was struck by the similarity.



WELL, WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?

 In the comments on Richard's latest post, Robert said:
"Have you been to confession? There were plenty going after Mass this morning. No one would have noticed you if you sat next to the lady with the restless child."

I replied with:

"Is The Lady With The Restless Child another of those paintings or statues of The Virgin Mary?
Later on I wondered if there ever had been something like that and, blow me down found this:


The painting is 'La Vierge au lys', also known as 'The Madonna of the Lilies' - an 1899 oil painting by the French artist William-Adolphe Bouguereau. 

Its main claim to fame is this according to Google search:

"The classic spoof painting commonly referred to as "Our Lady of the Restless Child" is actually a real, unedited 1899 oil painting titled La Vierge au lys (The Virgin of the Lilies) by the French academic artist William-Adolphe Bouguereau.
While intended as a serious, beautiful piece of religious art, the painting went viral on social media as a meme because of the baby's funny, hyperactive expression and aggressive stance.

Why the Painting Became a Meme
The "Restless" Energy: While Mary looks completely serene and at peace, the infant Jesus is squirming out of her arms with his arms flung wide and a wild look in his eyes.
The Relatable Parenting Humor: Parents widely share the painting to jokingly describe the struggle of trying to hold a hyperactive, wriggling toddler who is determined to escape.
The Contrast: The ultimate humor comes from the dramatic contrast between traditional, solemn religious imagery and the universal chaos of everyday parenting"


I always knew that Robert's posts and comments were strange but now it seems that they are stranger than fiction.

A QUICKIE SATURDAY MORNING POST

 I took my foot for a test run this morning - actually a walk - as It was feeling less sore.

I did about 6 kms but then decided to get a bus back home so as not to aggravate it.

In Cuba Street I felt like an ice cream but Duck Island was closed and the other one I went to didn't sell ice cream at all. Note: a bit of advice here. Peaches 'n' Cream is NOT an ice cream shop (maybe an "I scream" shop). The readers should not make my mistake and go there although Richard would be OK as he's going to Hell anyway but Robert would have to spend the rest of his mortal life in Confession.



Friday, 11 September 2026

WHEN YOU'RE (NOT YOUR) THAT GUY



I like this apart from its (not it's) obvious Americanism. It reminds me of someone ...

People who fix other people's grammar are often called pedants, nitpickers, or grammar Nazis.

It's (not its) annoying because:
  • It misses the point.
  • It interrupts the flow of the 'conversation'.
  • It can be arrogant and bullying. 
If a message is understood then criticising a simple typo shows you care more about showing off than actually listening and the interruption can be construed as being rude.

What's funny though is that the grammar Nazi often misspells a word or messes up their own punctuation in the very same comment that they publish.

AND NOW FOR SOMETHING INTERESTING*

 * "Thank you for your post.
 Now, with the next post, you just need to work on making it interesting."

- RICHARD OF RICHARD'S BASS BAG

Well, be careful of what you ask for.

I guess most of you will be familiar with the Moving House and similar TV series.


I've watched a few programmes and found the huge trucks and the developing technology interesting.

We had a closehand view of it last night when two huge trucks moved two large classroom buildings from the school across the road from our house. They had to manoeuvre them out the school gate, beneath trees to make a tight right hand turn onto our narrow street with cars parked either side. As far as I could see no damage was done and they get away alright. The exercise took about 40 minutes.







Now that was interesting.




Thursday, 10 September 2026

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE *

 * Not that trite platitude that Americans have been using for the last 10 years relating to US servicemen and which, unbelievably is being used in New Zealand by fools who do everything by rote even platitudes. It's up there with "Have a nice day" and "Missing you already". Robert's silly Catholic "I love you" is just as bad.

Now Richard will probably accuse me of being an old moaner and wanting to pick fights with everyone like Mike at the tennis club, inconsiderate drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, telecom industry personnel, bank employees, tradesmen, supermarket cashiers, other supermarket shoppers, people who use their phones at the cinema and many others including bus drivers who I mentioned in this recent post here: NO THANKS

Talking of bus drivers, this morning, as it was raining and because my foot is still sore I decided to take a bus to Willis Street. I walked down to Thorndon Quay, crossed the road to the bus stop and luckily saw a bus coming along. I and a woman at the bus stop waved at the driver to signal that we wanted him to stop but he just sailed past without making any effort to pull into the official stop. It was in service, displayed a number 3 destination and had passenger onboard. Bastard!

I'll be thinking twice about thanking the bus drivers as I exit the buses in future.

Sheesh!





Wednesday, 9 September 2026

THE ONE TRUE RELIGION

 


I watched this film last night on Netflix. It's quite good and well worth a look.

Robert might have to get approval from the Vatican to watch it but, given that it exposes Catholicism along with all other religions as nonsense then that permission is unlikely to be granted.

It's a psychological horror film about two Mormon missionaries who pay a home visit to a man who showed interest in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon). He debates (lectures) religious history with them before things take a nasty turn.
In a way it's a bit like Richard and me discussing with Robert the inconsistencies of Christianity and Catholicism in particular without of course the 'nasty turn'.

You readers will like the heretic's (Hugh Grant) overview of the 'big three' religions - Catholicism, Islam and Judaism and the connecting the dots he does.

I see on-line that the film is receiving positive reviews although the churches are a bit miffed by it:

Church responses
The LDS Church released a statement condemning the film's portrayal of violence against women. They then posted an article on missionary safety, intended to "assist journalists and the public with questions and concerns regarding the safety and well-being of missionaries". A number of former Latter-day Saints praised the film as a realistic and nuanced portrayal of missionaries.

Writing in 'The Christian Post', the Christian apologist Robin Schumacher noted that Mr. Reed became "his own god and asserting control over those around him—something that is indeed frightening". Schumacher concludes that Mr. Reed's behaviour in the film was consistent with Fyodor Dostoevsky's dictum: "Without God all things are permitted." Schumacher did criticize the film, however, for Mr. Reed spouting the claims of the Christian myth theory. In the same vein, Bret Eckelberry, in his review for 'Plugged In', critiques 'Heretic' for presenting this "poorly evidenced fringe hypothesis widely rejected by both Christian and secular scholars" as "something new and shocking."


Watch it!


Tuesday, 8 September 2026

MISCELLANEOUS ...

 ...  Or, as those wi* from the "Nui would put it: 🚀 *.


Miscellaneous #1

New World supermarket.

Last week as I was buying groceries a pushy woman (PW) customer at the checkout behind loaded all of her shit close to my good stuff on the conveyor belt. There was no divider to put down. As I was watching the cashier scan items I saw that at the end of my stuff she had scanned the first of PW's stuff - a $9.95 charge for McCain's frozen pizza slices. Shit in fact. I make my own pizzas. I alerted the cashier and she put the item back amongst PW's crap and I assumed cancelled the entry. 

Yesterday when I found the till receipt in my jacket pocket I checked it and there was a $9.95 charge for pizza slices. I went on-line to request a refund but found the website process difficult and when I did manage to find a portal there wasn't enough allowance for characters for me to explain the reason for the refund request.

I then found a phone number to ring and after a long wait explained to the person at the other end what I wanted only to discover that he dealt with on-line purchase problems only.

I found another link to complaints and re-entered everything that I said initially on the website form and sent the request away. To where I don't know. It might as well have been to Mars as I received no acknowledgement of acceptance and today no follow-up email. Bummer.

Today I decided to go to the store in person (which I didn't do yesterday as my foot was sore.) Today I had to go out anyway to pick up a prescription from the pharmacy which isn't far from the supermarket. I was prepared for an argument only to discover that the guy manning the customer service booth was very helpful and immediately processed the credit to my bank card. He also told me that as the error was a scanning error on their part the policy is the credit double the amount so I received a $19.90 credit! Remember - it pays to keep take your receipt when they ask and keep it for a few days just in case.

Miscellaneous #2

The doctors.

Last week I requested a repeat of my medicines and, after a few days received a notice that the 4 items were approved and that they were available from the pharmacy. Last Friday I went to the pharmacy only to discover that 2 of the 4 items were dispensed. When I queried it they said I had to order again via the doctors. I went on-line again to the doctors via Manage My Health and requested again the missing items. On Monday of this week I received a reply from the doctors saying that the request was rejected as the initial request had been processed.

Yesterday I marched limped to the pharmacy with the copies of the initial prescription request (4 items) that were marked as approved, the prescription receipt from the pharmacy (2 items) and the rather snippy response to my second request from the doctor saying that the request was rejected AS IT HAD BEEN PROCESSED DAYS EARLIER! I spent a half an hour with the pharmacist and his assistants trying to get a resolution with no success. They said that they only received an order for 2 items and the doctors maintained that they had sent an order for 4.

I went next to the doctors surgery which fortunately is next door to the pharmacy. I then spent another 10 minutes explaining the situation and then had to wait to see a 'clinical' nurse. I explained it all to her and she looked up the details on the computer. This showed my initial request and the doctor's approval of 4 items and the order of 4 items to the pharmacy. It was then that the nurse said that they have been having problems with the computer system and glitches were occuring. She promised to request the prescription again, urgently from the doctor who was at that moment busy with a patient. "I'm more than a patient" I thought "I'm impatient" but thanked her and made my way home.

Today I received an alert from the doctors surgery and the pharmacy conforming the availability of the 2 items which I collected before going to the supermarket.

The result was positive but the downside in this in time and stress is unacceptable. It's just as well that I'm so easy-going.













* Half 'wits'

Monday, 7 September 2026

ATHEISTIC DEVIL MAN

Robert has taken a new tack and instead of going about loving everyone including sinners he has gone on the offensive like that old version of god who likes to drown people. In recent comments he has said:

"Bullshit. Get a life atheistic devil man."

"Get a life and start posting how wonderful atheism is."

He did say this and here's proof with screenshots as he will delete his blogs and comments soon:



I kind of like being called an atheistic devil man. It's better than "Hey you!" or "Stop thief!" I guess.



Apart from the interesting image it conjures up ...




















...  the paradox in Robert's statement intrigues me.

He has mixed the religious representation of evil - the devil - with the platform of rejecting religion and the supernatural - atheism.
"Well done that man!" as Father McCann (a living manifestation of the devil if ever there was one) would have said. 

At least Robert is being consistent in his contradictions.